A media group from Indonesia and Malaysia talk to trainees at a vocational education and training center in Hotan in February. Photo: Liu Xin/GT

 


China issued on Thursday a stern response to countries which signed a joint letter to the UN criticizing China’s policies in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, with observers saying their criticism is based on groundless guesswork and double standards on human rights issues would hinder the global counter-terrorism work. 

Human Rights Watch released a joint letter signed by 22 countries at the UN’s top human rights body, urging China to “end its mass arbitrary detentions and related violations against Muslims in the Xinjiang region.” 

Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Geng Shuang said at a press briefing on Thursday that China strongly opposes the 22 countries that politicize human rights issues and urges these countries to abandon their biases and cease interference with China’s domestic affairs on the pretext of Xinjiang-related issues.

Geng called the accusations a disregard for the truth and groundless slander and attacks on China, and noted that China has invited members of the UN Human Rights office of the High Commissioner to Xinjiang.

The 22 countries include 18 European countries, Japan, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. 

A source close to the Chinese delegation to the United Nationals Human Rights Council (UNHRC) told the Global Times that China is not the country under the Universal Periodic Review at the UN this time and the 22 countries may want to hype China’s Xinjiang policies by releasing the joint letter now.

China has invited many diplomats and foreign media outlets to Xinjiang and shown them the education and training centers, which helps the international community get more information about what is really happening in Xinjiang, the source said.

“The 22 countries, all developed ones, cannot represent the whole world. Security and stability is necessary for people to enjoy their human rights and the view suits the interests of the majority of society,” said Qian Jinyu, executive dean of the Human Rights Institution of Northwest University of Political Science and Law based in Shaanxi Province. 

“Envoys who signed the joint letter have never gone to Xinjiang. They have never talked to trainees in the education and vocational training centers, nor have they been given a full picture of what is happening in Xinjiang. Their understanding of the training centers is based on biased reports,” Qian said.

He noted that there are three kinds of trainees in the centers – people who were incited, coerced or induced into participating in terrorist or extremist activities in circumstances that were not serious enough to constitute a crime; those who participated in terrorist or extremist activities that posed a real danger but did not cause actual harm; those who were convicted and received prison sentences for terrorist or extremist crimes and after serving their sentences, have been assessed as still posing a potential threat to society.

 “From this we can see that launching training centers is not ‘arbitrary detention’ of any ethnic group, but is aimed at helping those who need help to get rid of the influence of extremism and return to normal life,” Qian said. 

Mijiti Mermoti, principal of an education and vocational training center in Kashi, said that the training center does not target any ethnic group or religion.

The Global Times reporter happened to meet Paher Tursun at a training center in Shule county in in Xinjiang’s Hotan Prefecture. He said that he is not a Muslim but out of curiosity, he happened to watch some videos that spread extremism and sent them to his friends.


A trainee takes up painting at a training center in February. Photo: Liu Xin/GT 

Double standards

“These foreign envoys’ criticism of China’s Xinjiang policies is based on groundless guessing and fake news spread on some Western media. The double standards held by some Western countries have become the biggest obstacles for the global counter-terrorism work,” Li Wei, a counter-terrorism expert at the China Institute of Contemporary International Relations in Beijing, told the Global Times.

Recent terrorist attacks that happened in developed countries, including the tragedy in New Zealand, in which a right-wing terror attack on two New Zealand mosques killed 51, showed that some developed countries are facing problems in dealing with refugees and terrorism threats in their own countries, Li said.

 “Instead of focusing on solving their own problems, they criticize China’s policies in Xinjiang, which has helped bring stability and peace to the region and effectively protect local residents’ rights on living and development,” Li said. 

The joint letter and the continuing criticism of China’s Xinjiang policies show that some developed countries hope developing countries remain in turmoil and stagnation on development, which would fit the developing countries’ interests. And this is an inhumane practice, Li said.

On the sidelines of the 41th session of the UNHRC, China invited people from Xinjiang and envoys to the UN who had visited Xinjiang to share what they have experienced in Xinjiang.  

Many of them said that Xinjiang has prioritized protecting the interests of people of all ethnic groups and taken measures to fight terrorism and extremism, chinanews.com reported on July 3. 

Envoys from many countries, including Russia, Algeria, Laos, Serbia and Pakistan shared their experience in Xinjiang and praised the regional government’s efforts on poverty alleviation work, protection of religious freedom and counter-terrorism. 

The joint letter also called on “China to uphold its national laws and international obligations and to respect human rights and fundamental freedoms, including freedom of religion or belief.”

According to a white paper released by the State Council Information Office, the Xinjiang regional government has put priority on taking counter-terrorism measures and de-radicalization in accordance with laws, which include the education and vocational training centers.

Trainees sign agreements with the education and training centers before going there. The agreement presented by one trainee reached by the Global Times showed it contains training goals and methods, criteria for program completion and assessment methods. 

Geng said at the Thursday press briefing that “The Chinese government and people have the right to speak in terms of the Xinjiang policies. In the face of terrorist and extremist threats, Xinjiang has taken a series of measures, including the establishment of training centers, which help improve the security in the region.” 

There has been no violent attack in Xinjiang for more than two years, and local residents’ sense of security and happiness have greatly improved. And they sincerely support the government’s measures, Geng added.  

Traditions of religious people in Xinjiang have been given full respect. For example, residents in Xinjiang were given one day off to celebrate the Eid al-Fitr on June 5. 

For those self-proclaimed victims, who said they “escaped” from the training centers and told their stories to some Western media, the Chinese government has confirmed that they fabricated their stories. 

And if the training centers are really “concentration camps” as they described, how could they manage to escape from the “strict surveillance” of the government? There are many loopholes in their stories which some Western media choose not to double check, experts said.  

People who live in Xinjiang should have the right to say whether they are happy, not those who have other political purposes or seek personal gains under the guise of caring for Xinjiang residents, they said.